Graph scaling isn't readable

[thesammykins]

The example recording is just the most notible example of how the graph scales on the highest figure.

The graphs should also default to the Spending being selected and the rest un-selected so the label listing doesn't overflow on expenses/totals.

Screen.Recording.2023-02-08.at.3.18.33.pm.mov

[Hona]

The example recording is just the most notible example of how the graph scales on the highest figure.

Okay so we have a primary income and some smaller possible incomes. I'm not sure the best way to make the graph scale in a way its easy to read. Logarithmic will make the graph pointless, I think. Any ideas?

The graphs should also default to the Spending being selected and the rest un-selected so the label listing doesn't overflow on expenses/totals.

Are you talking about the total graph, that it should show the transactional accounts by default?

[thesammykins]

It's a weird balance.. I think overall the graphs are good to look at but I'm not sure if they are good at showing the incoming v. outgoing.

Might be purely because I haven't quite got it where I want it in terms of plotting what I expect to be spending each week (like properly calculating coffee spend as an example). Probably a hard one to fix because it relies so heavily on knowing what you're spending.

Probably absolutely zero way to make it 'better', might just be the learning curve for me to know what I'm looking at.

[thesammykins]

Is it possible to have the list of savers or expenses more condensed? I think if it was tailored landscape it makes more sense e.g. 5 per column or something? Once you have a lot of Savers (bizzare I know) it becomes a bit long.