Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
760 lines (586 loc) · 22.6 KB

File metadata and controls

760 lines (586 loc) · 22.6 KB

ROADMAP: Heinrich Project Development Plan

Prepared: December 26, 2025
Target Vision: Enterprise-grade TRIZ-AI solution
Timeline Horizon: 24 months


Phase Overview

Phase 1: MVP Foundation     [Q1-Q2 2026]  → "Proof of Concept"
Phase 2: Production Ready   [Q3-Q4 2026]  → "Stable Release"
Phase 3: Market Entry       [2027]        → "Commercial Launch"
Phase 4: Scale & Expand     [2027+]       → "Enterprise Platform"

PHASE 1: MVP FOUNDATION (3-4 months)

Goal: Complete, working TRIZ pipeline that demonstrates core value proposition

1.1 Core Pipeline Completion (6 weeks)

Sprint 1-2: Contradiction Identification Engine

  • Deliverable: Implement contradiction matrix lookup algorithm
    # Pseudocode
    def identify_contradiction(parsed_problem):
        # Map problem text → 39 parameters
        improving_param = map_to_parameter(parsed_problem.desired_improvement)
        worsening_param = map_to_parameter(parsed_problem.undesired_consequence)
        
        # Look up in contradiction matrix
        principles = contradiction_matrix[(improving_param, worsening_param)]
        
        # Rank by relevance to problem context
        return sorted(principles, key=relevance_score)
  • Tests: 50+ test cases covering all parameter combinations
  • Acceptance: Can identify contradictions in 20 reference TRIZ cases

Sprint 2-3: Principle Selector with Scoring

  • Deliverable: Intelligent principle selection and ranking
    def select_principles(contradiction, problem_context):
        # Get recommended principles from matrix
        candidates = get_principles(contradiction)
        
        # Score by:
        # 1. Domain relevance (manufacturing, software, etc.)
        # 2. Principle complexity (conservative for safety-critical)
        # 3. Historical success rate (when available)
        scores = {p: score_principle(p, problem_context) for p in candidates}
        
        return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
  • Tests: Validate against domain experts for 30 test problems
  • Acceptance: Top-3 principles match expert recommendations 80%+ of time

Sprint 3-4: Effects Lookup & Scientific Integration

  • Deliverable: Enrich effects database and enable lookup
    • Expand effects_database.json with 100+ scientific effects
    • Implement effect → principle cross-reference system
    • Add effect domain tags (physics, chemistry, materials, etc.)
  • Tests: Validate effects database completeness
  • Acceptance: Can retrieve applicable effects for any principle

1.2 LLM Integration (4 weeks)

Sprint 4-5: Implement OpenAI Adapter

  • Deliverable: Full OpenAI/GPT-4 integration
    class OpenAIAdapter(BaseLLMAdapter):
        def generate(self, prompt, system_prompt=None, max_tokens=2000):
            response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
                model=self.config["model"],
                messages=[
                    {"role": "system", "content": system_prompt or self.config["system_prompt"]},
                    {"role": "user", "content": prompt}
                ],
                max_tokens=max_tokens,
                temperature=self.temperature
            )
            return LLMResponse(
                content=response.choices[0].message.content,
                model=response.model,
                usage=response.usage
            )
  • Features:
    • Token counting for cost estimation
    • Retry logic with exponential backoff
    • Rate limiting handling
    • Context window management
  • Tests: Mock API calls, validate request/response formats
  • Acceptance: Successfully calls OpenAI API and returns structured responses

Sprint 5-6: Implement Anthropic Adapter

  • Deliverable: Claude API integration
  • Identical approach to OpenAI for consistency
  • Acceptance: Can switch between providers via config

1.3 Concept Generator with LLM (4 weeks)

Sprint 6-7: LLM-Based Synthesis

  • Deliverable: Replace template-based generation with LLM prompting
    def generate_concepts(self, problem, principles, effects):
        concepts = []
        for principle in principles:
            prompt = self._build_synthesis_prompt(problem, principle, effects)
            response = self.llm.generate(prompt, system_prompt=SYNTHESIS_SYSTEM_PROMPT)
            
            concept = parse_concept_response(response)
            concept.principle_justification = principle.description
            concept.applicable_effects = effects
            
            concepts.append(concept)
        
        return concepts
  • Prompts to create:
    • synthesis_prompt.txt - Generate solution from principle
    • advantages_prompt.txt - Identify advantages of approach
    • challenges_prompt.txt - Identify implementation challenges
    • adaptation_prompt.txt - Adapt to specific constraints
  • Tests: Validate prompt quality with sample outputs
  • Acceptance: Generated solutions are coherent and actionable

Sprint 7-8: Pipeline Orchestration

  • Deliverable: End-to-end pipeline that produces working solutions
    class HeinrichPipeline:
        def solve(self, problem_text):
            # Step 1: Parse
            parsed = self.problem_parser.parse(problem_text)
            
            # Step 2: Identify contradictions
            contradiction = self.contradiction_identifier.identify(parsed)
            
            # Step 3: Select principles
            principles = self.principle_selector.select(contradiction, parsed.context)
            
            # Step 4: Lookup effects
            effects = self.effects_lookup.lookup(principles)
            
            # Step 5: Generate concepts
            concepts = self.concept_generator.generate(parsed, principles, effects)
            
            # Step 6: Adapt solutions
            adapted = self.adaptation_planner.adapt(concepts, parsed.constraints)
            
            # Step 7: Build report
            report = self.report_builder.build(parsed, contradiction, principles, effects, adapted)
            
            return report
  • Tests: Integration tests with end-to-end execution
  • Acceptance: Can run complete analysis on 10 diverse problems

1.4 Testing & Validation (Ongoing through Phase 1)

Test Suite Overhaul

  • Unit Tests: Expand from stubs to comprehensive coverage

    • Contradiction identifier: 50+ test cases
    • Principle selector: 30+ test cases
    • Concept generator: 20+ test cases
    • LLM adapters: 40+ test cases
  • Integration Tests: End-to-end pipeline validation

    • 20 diverse TRIZ case studies from literature
    • Ground truth: Expert-validated solutions
    • Success metric: Generated principles match expert top-3 in 80% of cases
  • TRIZ Methodology Tests: Validate TRIZ fidelity

    • Contradiction matrix lookup: 100% accuracy
    • Principle selection: Matches classical TRIZ recommendations
    • Parameter mapping: Correct identification of system elements

Golden Test Suite

  • Create: 10-15 canonical TRIZ problems with expert-validated solutions

    • Example: Classical problems from TRIZ literature
    • Documentation: Why each principle is appropriate
    • Metrics: Scoring rubric for solution quality
  • Use: Regression testing for all future changes


1.5 Documentation (Concurrent)

  • API Documentation: Auto-generated from code (Sphinx)
  • Pipeline Tutorial: Walk-through with example problem
  • Architecture Deep-Dive: How each component works
  • Contributing Guide: Clear instructions for extending system
  • Deployment Guide: Local setup + Docker

1.6 Phase 1 Success Criteria

Must achieve:

  1. Complete TRIZ pipeline produces solutions end-to-end
  2. Golden test suite passes with 80%+ principle selection accuracy
  3. All core modules have unit tests (>70% coverage)
  4. LLM integration working with both OpenAI and Anthropic
  5. Can handle 100+ problems without errors
  6. Documentation sufficient for developer onboarding

PHASE 2: PRODUCTION READY (3-4 months)

Goal: Robust, deployable, observable system ready for real users

2.1 Production Infrastructure

Error Handling & Resilience

  • Global error handler with structured logging
  • Circuit breaker for LLM API calls
  • Fallback strategies:
    • If LLM unavailable: Use rule-based concept generation
    • If contradiction not found: Return all 40 principles ranked by domain
  • Validation: Validate all inputs, return helpful errors

Logging & Observability

  • Structured logging with correlation IDs
  • Metrics collection:
    • Pipeline execution time
    • LLM token usage (cost tracking)
    • Principle selection accuracy (vs. human evaluation)
    • User satisfaction (if telemetry enabled)
  • Dashboards: Basic health monitoring

Configuration Management

  • Environment-based config:
    # config.yaml
    llm:
      provider: openai  # or: anthropic, ollama
      model: gpt-4-turbo
      temperature: 0.7
      max_tokens: 2000
    
    database:
      type: sqlite  # or: postgresql
      path: ./heinrich.db
    
    logging:
      level: INFO
      format: json
  • Secrets management: Support for .env files and environment variables
  • Feature flags: A/B testing for algorithm variants

Database/Persistence

  • Implement: SQLite (local) or PostgreSQL (production)
  • Schema:
    • Problems analyzed (with metadata)
    • Solutions generated (with feedback)
    • User evaluations (rating solutions)
    • Case history (for learning)
  • Purpose: Enable learning from user feedback

2.2 API & User Interface

REST API

  • Endpoints:
    POST   /api/v1/solve          - Solve a problem
    GET    /api/v1/problems/:id   - Retrieve past problem
    POST   /api/v1/feedback       - Rate solution quality
    GET    /api/v1/principles     - List all principles
    GET    /api/v1/parameters     - List all parameters
    GET    /api/v1/statistics     - System statistics
    
  • Features:
    • OpenAPI/Swagger documentation
    • Rate limiting (100 req/min per API key)
    • Pagination for large result sets
    • JSON response formatting

CLI Tool

  • Commands:
    heinrich solve "problem description"
    heinrich list-principles
    heinrich validate-knowledge
    heinrich serve  # Start API server

Web Dashboard (Optional for Phase 2)

  • Simple problem input form
  • Solution visualization
  • History browser
  • (Can defer to Phase 3)

2.3 Deployment & Containerization

Docker

  • Dockerfile:

    • Multi-stage build (dev dependencies stripped)
    • Security: Non-root user
    • Health checks
  • docker-compose.yml:

    • Heinrich API service
    • Optional PostgreSQL
    • Optional monitoring (Prometheus)

CI/CD Pipeline

  • GitHub Actions:
    • Run tests on every PR
    • Lint code (flake8, black)
    • Type check (mypy)
    • Security scan (bandit)
    • Build Docker image
    • Deploy to staging on push to main

Deployment Targets

  • Local: Docker Compose
  • Cloud: AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Run, Azure Container Instances
  • Enterprise: Kubernetes-ready

2.4 Code Quality

Type Hints

  • Complete: Add type hints to all functions
  • Tool: mypy for static type checking
  • CI: Fail build if type errors

Documentation

  • Docstrings: Google/NumPy style for all public functions
  • Code comments: Explain why, not what
  • Examples: Every module should have usage example

Testing

  • Target: 80%+ code coverage
  • Tools: pytest with coverage.py
  • Reports: HTML coverage reports in CI

Code Style

  • Formatter: Black (automatic code formatting)
  • Linter: flake8 + pylint
  • Pre-commit: Hooks to prevent non-compliant commits

2.5 Performance Optimization

Profiling

  • Identify bottlenecks:
    • Is it problem parsing?
    • Is it LLM API calls? (Usually yes)
    • Is it data loading?

Caching

  • Cache layers:
    • Knowledge base (in memory)
    • Parameter/principle lookups
    • LLM API responses (for identical requests)

Async Support

  • Make LLM calls async to handle concurrent requests
  • Benefits: Single server instance handles multiple users

2.6 Security & Compliance

Security Hardening

  • Input validation: Sanitize problem text
  • Output validation: Never return secrets in logs
  • Dependency scanning: Check for vulnerabilities
  • Secrets: No hardcoded API keys

Data Privacy

  • User data: Minimal collection (only what's needed)
  • Retention policy: Delete old problems after 90 days (configurable)
  • Logging: Don't log full problem text (only hashes)

Documentation

  • Security policy: SECURITY.md with responsible disclosure
  • Privacy policy: What data is collected and how

2.7 Phase 2 Success Criteria

Must achieve:

  1. Passes security audit checklist
  2. API serves 100+ requests/minute stably
  3. Deployment to 3+ cloud platforms successful
  4. 80%+ test coverage
  5. Zero critical vulnerabilities in dependencies
  6. Comprehensive error handling (no crashes)
  7. Logging/monitoring operational
  8. Can run offline (no required external dependencies)

PHASE 3: MARKET ENTRY (6 months)

Goal: Launch commercial product with competitive advantage

3.1 Market Research & Differentiation

Competitive Analysis

  • Goldfire Insight: Analyze pricing, feature set, positioning
  • Custom GPT + TRIZ: Understand DIY alternatives
  • Patent AI tools: Learning from adjacent market

Customer Discovery

  • Interviews: 20-30 with target customers

    • R&D teams in manufacturing
    • Innovation managers in tech
    • Patent attorneys
    • Consulting firms using TRIZ
  • Surveys: What problems do they have with existing solutions?

Product Positioning

  • Identify: Unique value proposition
    • Example: "Explainable AI that actually follows TRIZ principles, not just mimics them"
    • Example: "Faster than Goldfire, cheaper than consultants"
    • Example: "Integrates with your existing tools (Jira, Confluence, etc.)"

3.2 Product Enhancement

Domain-Specific Models

  • Create: Specialized versions for key industries
    • Manufacturing (mechanical systems)
    • Software/Tech (feature design)
    • Materials science (new materials)
    • Business processes (non-technical)

Advanced Features

  • Multi-step problems: Solve cascading contradictions
  • Team collaboration: Multiple users on one problem
  • Solution comparison: Side-by-side evaluation
  • Patent analysis mode: Find solutions to patented problems
  • Integration APIs: Connect to Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Slack

Knowledge Base Expansion

  • Add: Industry-specific effects databases
  • Validate: Have domain experts review principle selections for their field
  • Create: Case study library with documented solutions

3.3 Validation & Case Studies

Golden Test Suite Expansion

  • Build: 50+ validated case studies
    • 10 from manufacturing
    • 10 from software/product
    • 10 from materials science
    • 10 from business process
    • 10 from historical TRIZ problems

Benchmark Against Baseline

  • Metrics:
    • Principle selection accuracy vs. human experts
    • Execution time vs. classical TRIZ consultants
    • Cost per problem solved
    • User satisfaction scores

Publication & Credibility

  • Write: 3-5 technical papers

    • "Hybrid TRIZ-AI for Systematic Innovation"
    • "Empirical Evaluation of Principle Selection Accuracy"
    • Case studies in target journals
  • Conference presentations: TRIZ conferences, innovation summits


3.4 Pricing & Business Model

Pricing Options

Option A: Freemium SaaS

  • Free tier: 5 problems/month
  • Pro: $99/month (unlimited, API access)
  • Enterprise: Custom (dedicated instance, training)

Option B: Per-Use API

  • $0.50 - $5.00 per problem solved
  • Depends on complexity (LLM tokens used)
  • Volume discounts for enterprise

Option C: Hybrid

  • Subscription for web app + pay-per-call for API
  • Best of both worlds

Customer Segments

Target 1: Innovation Teams (SME)

  • Pricing: $199/month
  • Problem: Need systematic innovation
  • Solution: DIY tool that guides the process

Target 2: Consulting Firms

  • Pricing: Custom enterprise contract
  • Problem: Scale TRIZ expertise beyond consultants
  • Solution: AI as accelerator, not replacement

Target 3: Patent/R&D Organizations

  • Pricing: $10-50k/year
  • Problem: Generate novel solutions at scale
  • Solution: Integrated into their workflow

3.5 Go-to-Market Strategy

Phase 3.1: Beta Launch (Months 1-2)

  • Closed beta: 50-100 power users (TRIZ practitioners)
  • Collect: Feedback and usage metrics
  • Document: Success stories and testimonials

Phase 3.2: Public Launch (Months 3-4)

  • Announcement: Blog post, Twitter, newsletter
  • Pricing announcement: Clear pricing tiers
  • Marketing: Technical blog about TRIZ + AI
  • Partnerships: Start conversations with TRIZ organizations

Phase 3.3: Growth (Months 5-6)

  • Community building: TRIZ + innovation community
  • Content marketing: Guides, tutorials, case studies
  • Sales process: Enterprise sales for larger deals
  • Partnerships: Integrations with complementary tools

3.6 Phase 3 Success Criteria

Must achieve:

  1. 1,000+ paying users or $50k+ MRR
  2. 80%+ customer satisfaction score
  3. Benchmarked against Goldfire (comparable or better accuracy)
  4. 3+ published case studies
  5. 50+ validated test cases in industry domains
  6. 10+ integration partnerships
  7. Sustainable unit economics (CAC payback < 12 months)

PHASE 4: SCALE & EXPAND (Ongoing 2027+)

Goal: Enterprise-grade platform serving innovation teams globally

4.1 Platform Expansion

Vertical Integration

  • Add: Specialized tools for specific industries
  • R&D Suite: Problem + Solution tracking
  • Innovation Portfolio: Manage multiple projects
  • Impact Measurement: Track implemented solutions' ROI

Horizontal Integration

  • Integrations: Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Slack, MS Teams
  • APIs: Robust API for embedding in customer workflows
  • Webhooks: Real-time event notifications

International Expansion

  • Localization: Not just translation, cultural adaptation
  • Regulatory: Compliance with data laws (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)
  • Support: Multi-language customer success team

4.2 Advanced Capabilities (Research)

Hybrid Reasoning

  • Combine:
    • TRIZ systematic approach (existing)
    • Design Thinking (empathy)
    • Lean methodology (rapid testing)
    • Systems thinking (complex systems)

Multi-Agent Orchestration

  • Implement: Multiple AI agents working together
    • Domain expert agent (understands industry)
    • TRIZ specialist agent (applies methodology)
    • Critic agent (evaluates solutions)
    • Orchestrator (coordinates)

Knowledge Distillation

  • Learn: From successful solutions over time
  • Improve: Principle selection based on user feedback
  • Personalize: Adapt to company's innovation culture

4.3 Enterprise Features

SSO & Team Management

  • SAML/OAuth integration for enterprises
  • Role-based access control
  • Audit trails for compliance

Advanced Reporting

  • Analytics dashboard: Problem solve patterns
  • Custom reports: Board-ready metrics
  • Export: PDF, Excel, custom formats

SLA & Support

  • Premium support: 24/7 response times
  • Dedicated success manager for enterprise customers
  • Training programs for innovation teams

IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Technical Stack (Recommended)

# Backend
Framework:        FastAPI (async, auto-docs)
Database:         PostgreSQL (scalable)
Caching:          Redis (performance)
Task Queue:       Celery (async LLM calls)
Monitoring:       Prometheus + Grafana
Logging:          ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana)

# Frontend
Framework:        React or Vue.js
API Client:       TanStack Query (React Query)
Visualization:    D3.js or Plotly (solution diagrams)

# DevOps
Containerization: Docker
Orchestration:    Kubernetes (Phase 3+)
CI/CD:            GitHub Actions (current) → ArgoCD (Phase 3)
Infrastructure:   Terraform (IaC)

# Testing
Unit/Integration: pytest + pytest-asyncio
API Testing:      Postman / REST Assured
Load Testing:     Locust or k6

Resource Planning

Phase 1 (MVP Foundation) - 3-4 months

  • Team:

    • 1 Technical Lead (full-time)
    • 2 Backend Engineers (full-time)
    • 1 QA/Test Engineer (full-time)
    • 0.5 DevOps Engineer (part-time)
    • 0.5 Technical Writer (part-time)
  • Cost: ~$150-200k (salary + overhead)

  • Infrastructure: ~$2-3k/month (cloud, LLM APIs)

Phase 2 (Production) - 3-4 months

  • Add:

    • 1 Product Manager
    • 1 Security Engineer
    • 1 Full-stack Engineer
  • Cost: ~$280-350k

  • Infrastructure: ~$5-8k/month

Phase 3 (Market Entry) - 6 months

  • Add:

    • 1 VP Product / CEO
    • 2 Sales / BD
    • 1 Marketing / Content
    • 1 Customer Success
    • 1 Data Analyst
  • Cost: ~$600-750k + sales commissions

  • Infrastructure: ~$10-20k/month + LLM costs


Funding Recommendations

Phase Timeline Funding Needed Suggested Route
1-2 6-8 months $300-500k Bootstrapped or Angel round
3-4 12-18 months $1-2M Seed round from deep-tech VCs
Scale 2+ years $5-10M Series A from innovation/enterprise VCs

RISK MITIGATION

Risks & Mitigations

Risk Severity Mitigation
LLM quality insufficient High Start with GPT-4, build rule-based fallback
Market doesn't value TRIZ Medium Validate with customer interviews early
Competitors move faster Medium Focus on niche (explainability) vs. general
LLM API costs too high Medium Implement caching, offer on-prem option
Talent acquisition High Build in tech hubs, offer equity
TRIZ experts skeptical Medium Include domain experts in development

SUCCESS METRICS SUMMARY

Phase 1 (MVP)

  • ✅ Working end-to-end pipeline
  • ✅ 80%+ principle selection accuracy
  • ✅ 2,000+ lines of tested code

Phase 2 (Production)

  • ✅ 1,000+ problems solved without errors
  • ✅ <5 second average solve time
  • ✅ 99% uptime SLA

Phase 3 (Market Entry)

  • ✅ 1,000+ active users
  • ✅ $50k+ monthly recurring revenue
  • ✅ 80%+ Net Promoter Score

Phase 4 (Scale)

  • ✅ 10,000+ active users
  • ✅ $500k+ annual revenue
  • ✅ 4+ enterprise customers

NEXT IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

  1. Week 1-2: Finalize Phase 1 sprint backlog
  2. Week 2-3: Assign development team
  3. Week 3+: Start with Contradiction Identifier (highest impact)
  4. Parallel: Begin customer discovery interviews

This roadmap is a living document. Update quarterly based on learnings, market feedback, and technical discoveries.

Version: 1.0
Last Updated: December 26, 2025
Next Review: March 2026