Any reason for not having Relationships.oneToMany?

[borsemayur2]

As per the doc, we have to use belongsTo with one-to-many but we can use Relationhips.oneToOne that does the mapping automatically. Any reason for this or it's not implemented yet?

[eveningkid]

That's true, oneToOne existed because it was simpler than calling belongsTo twice.

There was however an inconsistency, you're right. But it's now fixed!

As belongsTo is now used differently (see one-to-many), this should solve the problem.