SSA CFG: identity remover pass and TLSF backed instruction store#16674
Merged
Conversation
clonker
force-pushed
the
ssa-cfg-add-identity-remover-pass
branch
5 times, most recently
from
f56bdcd to
4524310
Compare
blishko
reviewed
May 6, 2026
Contributor
blishko
left a comment
blishko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good!
Just some things to clarify.
…ction store Treat a multi-return Call/BuiltinCall (numReturns >= 2) and its trailing Projections as a single allocation/release unit
clonker
force-pushed
the
ssa-cfg-add-identity-remover-pass
branch
from
4524310 to
c45d441
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the following two:
IdentityRemoverpassTrivialPhiEliminatorrewritten on top of the new identity/nop primitivesUnreachableBlockCleanerfrees instructions in unreachable blocks back into the store rather than keeping them around indefinitely