Skip to content

ci: switch PR title check to step-security/action-semantic-pull-request#25220

Open
nathanklick wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/pr-formatting-action-swap
Open

ci: switch PR title check to step-security/action-semantic-pull-request#25220
nathanklick wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/pr-formatting-action-swap

Conversation

@nathanklick
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Replaces step-security/conventional-pr-title-action@v3.2.2 with step-security/action-semantic-pull-request@v6.1.2 in .github/workflows/flow-pull-request-formatting.yaml.
  • Action pinned by commit SHA (75d2dd5deafa3e9fccc1626ecd58d076ed1d2c79) per repo convention.
  • Uses the action's default configuration, which enforces the standard Conventional Commits types.

Test plan

  • Verify the PR Formatting / Title Check job runs against this PR and passes on this conventionally-formatted title.
  • Open a follow-up draft PR with a non-conventional title to confirm the check fails as expected.

@nathanklick nathanklick requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2026 20:52
@nathanklick nathanklick requested a review from PavelSBorisov May 1, 2026 20:52
@trunk-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

trunk-io Bot commented May 1, 2026

Merging to main in this repository is managed by Trunk.

  • To merge this pull request, check the box to the left or comment /trunk merge below.

After your PR is submitted to the merge queue, this comment will be automatically updated with its status. If the PR fails, failure details will also be posted here

@lfdt-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

lfdt-bot commented May 1, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@nathanklick nathanklick requested a review from rbarker-dev May 1, 2026 20:52
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codacy-production Bot commented May 1, 2026

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (a9641f8) 100256 78914 78.71%
Head commit (0ca55ea) 100256 (+0) 78914 (+0) 78.71% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#25220) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@nathanklick nathanklick requested a review from joshmarinacci May 1, 2026 20:53
@nathanklick nathanklick self-assigned this May 1, 2026
@nathanklick nathanklick added the Feature Enhancement Enhancing an existing feature driven by business requirements. Typically backwards compatible. label May 1, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #25220   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     74.88%   74.88%           
  Complexity    11524    11524           
=========================================
  Files          2586     2586           
  Lines        100353   100353           
  Branches      11098    11097    -1     
=========================================
  Hits          75149    75149           
  Misses        21389    21389           
  Partials       3815     3815           

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Flaky Test(s) Detected

One or more flaky tests were detected in this run. These tests have been reported before.

Test Ticket
com.hedera.services.bdd.suites.freeze.JumpstartFileSuite#jumpstartsCorrectLiveWrappedRecordBlockHashes #24927
com.hedera.services.bdd.suites.validation.LogValidationTest#logsContainNoUnexpectedProblems #25154

Replaces step-security/conventional-pr-title-action@v3.2.2 with
step-security/action-semantic-pull-request@v6.1.2 (pinned by SHA) in the
PR Formatting workflow. Default configuration is used, which enforces
the standard Conventional Commits types.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <nathan@swirldslabs.com>
@nathanklick nathanklick force-pushed the chore/pr-formatting-action-swap branch from 29d4370 to 0ca55ea Compare May 1, 2026 23:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Flaky Test(s) Detected

One or more flaky tests were detected in this run. These tests have been reported before.

Test Ticket
com.hedera.services.bdd.suites.freeze.JumpstartFileSuite#jumpstartsCorrectLiveWrappedRecordBlockHashes #24927
com.hedera.services.bdd.suites.validation.LogValidationTest#logsContainNoUnexpectedProblems #25154

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Feature Enhancement Enhancing an existing feature driven by business requirements. Typically backwards compatible.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants