Re-write PBS updater script to not use Pants#23281
Merged
sureshjoshi merged 7 commits intopantsbuild:mainfrom Apr 21, 2026
Merged
Re-write PBS updater script to not use Pants#23281sureshjoshi merged 7 commits intopantsbuild:mainfrom
sureshjoshi merged 7 commits intopantsbuild:mainfrom
Conversation
sureshjoshi
added
category:internal
Member
Author
|
This PR would normally be a net negative code change, but 900 lines of PBS versions added |
benjyw
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I de-pantsed this script, as I didn't have to like bootstrapping Pants just to call Github. This new script uses the
ghCLI directly.One of the reasons to avoid Pants for this, is that avoiding the bootstrapping phase will let this script be a part of (e.g.) weekly dev releases and committed as part of the CI.
I wouldn't mind if someone else grabbed this to sanity test, but I deleted releases into the mid 2025's and let it re-run, and didn't observe JSON changes.